html - Why won't my 5 child divs go 100% across the parent div when they are set at 20%? -


i have parent div set 100% width , when set each of 5 children divs 20% each, theoretically each child div should contained inside parent div, rather breaking on second line.

i have done before , has worked, isn't working now.

it looks - 

<div class="parent">     <div class="child1"></div>     <div class="child2"></div>     <div class="child3"></div>     <div class="child4"></div>     <div class="child5"></div> </div>

here link code - http://jsfiddle.net/dtk5zl1e/

i using bootstrap if makes difference.

just add common class elements want float , add:

          <div class="container">                  <h1 class="versions">choose versions report</h1>                  <div class="compare nav"> hello                 </div>                  <div class="first-draft nav"> hi                 </div>                  <div class="second-draft nav"> hello                 </div>                  <div class="third-draft nav"> hi                 </div>                  <div class="fourth-draft nav"> hello                 </div>              </div>

and css

   .nav{     float:left;     }

jsfiddle http://jsfiddle.net/a_incarnati/dtk5zl1e/1/


-

Popular posts from this blog

debugging - Reference - What does this error mean in PHP? -

what this? this number of answers warnings, errors , notices might encounter while programming php , have no clue how fix. community wiki, invited participate in adding , maintaining list. why this? questions "headers sent" or "calling member of non-object" pop on stack overflow. root cause of questions same. answers questions typically repeat them , show op line change in his/her particular case. these answers not add value site because apply op's particular code. other users having same error can not read solution out of because localized. sad, because once understood root cause, fixing error trivial. hence, list tries explain solution in general way apply. what should here? if question has been marked duplicate of this, please find error message below , apply fix code. answers contain further links investigate in case shouldn't clear general answer alone. if want contribute, please add "favorite" error message, warning or notic...
Read more

c++ - Why doesn't unordered_set provide an array access operator -

i'm curious why stl container unordered_set , has constant time complexity random access on average, not provide method accessing elements distance first element in container. example: t& unordered_set::operator[](size_t index) { return *(begin() + index); } accessing element "by distance" implies there meaningful way measure distance. trouble std::unordered_set is is, well, unordered . hence, there no meaningful way of explaining "some distance beginning" in non-arbitrary way. if want access distance, copy data vector: std::vector tmp(unordered.begin(), unordered.end());
Read more